AS350 B3e course · Astar hazards
Loss of tail-rotor effectiveness
Low, slow, downwind — and a yaw to the left
The essentials
LTE is an unanticipated yaw at low airspeed — below about 30 kt — that does not stop without the pilot's action. FAA material describes it for American types as a right yaw; in the Astar it goes left, with the main rotor's torque.
It's most likely with high power, low speed, high density altitude and wind from particular directions. The defence is to know where the wind is, avoid the combination, and act early.
What LTE is — and isn't
The FAA and NTSB describe LTE as an uncommanded, rapid yaw that does not subside of its own accord and, uncorrected, can lead to loss of control. It is not a maintenance malfunction: the tail rotor is working, but the air reaching it isn't what it needs.
It can occur in varying degrees in any single-main-rotor helicopter below about 30 kt. The NTSB investigated 55 LTE accidents in the ten years from 2004 to 2014.
The regions, mirrored
Wind azimuths where loss of tail-rotor effectiveness is more likely. This diagram needs JavaScript.
Drag the wind round. The three regions are those FAA AC 90-95 describes for American rotors, mirrored for the Astar's clockwise rotor. NTSB Safety Alert SA-062 publishes the same clockwise regions — general helicopter data, not an AS350-specific chart.
AC 90-95's wind regions, mirrored
| How to read it | Relative wind, degrees clockwise from the nose (90° = from the right)1 |
|---|---|
| Main-rotor disc vortex — AC | 285–315° (front left)1 |
| Main-rotor disc vortex — Astar, mirrored | 45–75° (front right)3 |
| Weathercock stability — AC | 120–240° (from behind)1 |
| Weathercock stability — Astar | 120–240° (symmetric, unchanged)3 |
| Tail-rotor vortex ring — AC | 210–330° (left side)1 |
| Tail-rotor vortex ring — Astar, mirrored | 30–150° (right side)3 |
Main-rotor disc vortex
With wind of about 10–30 kt from about 45–75° off the nose on one side — for the Astar, the right, mirrored from the AC — the main rotor's tip vortex is blown into the tail rotor. The tail rotor works in disturbed air, its thrust varies, and the aircraft yaws unpredictably.
The pilot feels it as a sudden change in the pedal needed to hold heading. Left uncorrected, the yaw can build.
Weathercock stability
With the wind from behind, the fin wants to turn the tail into the wind like a weathervane. Left alone, the aircraft yaws — and once the yaw starts, it can accelerate.
Downwind hovering and slow downwind turns are where it bites.
Source 1
Tail-rotor vortex ring
With the wind from the side the tail rotor blows towards, the tail rotor can enter its own vortex ring state — the same flow problem the main rotor has in a steep descent. Its thrust becomes erratic and pedal inputs give unexpected results.
For the Astar, mirrored from the AC, that's wind from the right side. The AC says rapid and continuous pedal work is needed to hold heading when hovering in it. The workload itself is routine; the danger is a late correction or over-controlling.
Loss of translational lift
The fourth factor isn't a wind sector. When the aircraft slows below translational lift — on an approach, in a turn downwind, or when the wind drops — the rotor needs more power for the same lift. More power means more torque, and more right pedal in the Astar.
If the pilot doesn't anticipate it, the nose goes left. FAA material flags hovering in winds of about 8–12 kt as a typical case, where small changes in wind take translational lift away.
What makes it worse
AC 90-95 lists the contributing factors:
- high power, high mass and high density altitude
- low airspeed, especially below 30 kt
- turns towards the torque yaw at low speed downwind — left turns in the Astar
- low rotor rpm
- loss of translational lift with the wind behind
The NTSB adds turbulent air near ridgelines and large buildings.
Recognising it
LTE starts like an ordinary yaw — so the first sign is that it doesn't stop with the pedal you'd normally use, and the yaw rate may increase.
In the Astar the yaw is to the left, the same way the nose goes when you raise the collective. That makes it easy to read the first part as normal torque and be late with the pedal. The longer the rate builds, the harder it is to stop.
Recovery, as the AC describes it
For American types, AC 90-95 describes applying full opposite pedal, moving the cyclic forward to gain speed, and — altitude permitting — reducing power. Mirrored for the Astar, the pedal is right.
The approved technique for your aircraft comes from your RFM and your instructor.
The trade-offs in that recovery
Each part of the AC's recovery costs something. Reducing collective cuts the torque the tail rotor is fighting, so it helps stop the yaw — but it increases the rate of descent. The AC ties the amount to height above obstacles, gross weight and the atmosphere.
Forward cyclic gains speed so the fin and translational lift start to help, but it needs room ahead. Low over a confined area, neither comes free — which is why avoiding the set-up matters more than the recovery.
Source 1
Keeping out of it
FAA guidance, below about 30 kt:
- avoid tailwinds
- avoid out-of-ground-effect hovers and high-power demands such as slow downwind turns
- be alert to wind of about 8–12 kt in the hover
- keep rotor rpm in its normal range
- know the wind's direction and strength at all times, especially when busy, along ridgelines and around buildings
Tailwind approaches
A tailwind approach stacks the LTE factors. The wind is in the weathercock region. Airspeed is low while groundspeed looks normal, so the aircraft reaches the bottom slower through the air than it seems. And it arrives at the point that needs the most power just as translational lift goes.
Gusts and downdrafts near terrain add sudden power demands on top. If the site can only be approached downwind, that is a planning question to settle before you start down.
Grand Canyon, 2018
An EC130 B4 — a related type with a fenestron tail — was approaching to land near the Grand Canyon in gusting tailwind conditions, in an area of potential downdrafts and turbulence. Photos showed the windsock at 15 kt or more — the most it can show. The aircraft turned left through 720° and crashed.
The NTSB found no mechanical fault and gave the probable cause as loss of tail-rotor effectiveness and loss of control. It also noted that forecasts of strong winds had likely not reached the operator's pilots.
A tailwind approach at low speed and high power is the textbook LTE set-up — in any helicopter. Wind information has to reach the person flying.
In which direction is an unanticipated LTE yaw in the Astar?
Left, with the main rotor's torque — mirrored from the right yaw in FAA material.
Below what airspeed does AC 90-95 say LTE can occur?
Below about 30 kt, where the fin can't help and the tail rotor works hardest.
Which slow turn is riskier in the Astar when downwind?
Left — the direction torque already turns the aircraft. In American types it's the right turn.
Wind from about 45–75° off the Astar's right front puts the tail rotor in…
The main rotor's tip vortex is blown into the tail rotor. The AC's 285–315° region, mirrored.
In the AC's recovery, what does reducing collective cost?
Less torque helps stop the yaw, but the aircraft sinks faster — so how much depends on height.
Is LTE a sign that something on the tail rotor has failed?
The tail rotor is working; the air reaching it isn't. That's why wind awareness prevents it.
Sources
- AC 90-95, Unanticipated Right Yaw in Helicopters · FAA · 26 December 1995
- Clockwise-rotating helicopter differences · Helicopter Ground
- Safety Alert SA-062, Loss of Tail Rotor Effectiveness in Helicopters · NTSB · March 2017
- Helicopter Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-21B) · FAA · Chapter 11, Helicopter Emergencies and Hazards
- NTSB: winds triggered 2018 helitour fatal · AIN · 19 January 2021
- Aviation Investigation Final Report WPR18MA087 (Eurocopter EC130 B4 N155GC, Peach Springs, Arizona) · NTSB · 10 February 2018; Analysis and Survival aspects
- Grand Canyon air tour: tailwind, LTE and post-crash fire · Aerossurance · EC130 B4 N155GC, 10 February 2018
Educational only. Not approved training material, and never a substitute for the Rotorcraft Flight Manual, an instructor, or your operator's procedures. Figures marked as manufacturer data or test results are not limitations. This content is a draft and has not yet been reviewed by an instructor.